Evaluation of student performance:
“Mid-term” exams
(undergrad level, just
to help you keep up)
|
2@100pts,
but will be scaled such that these only contribute
40% of your
grade |
Final exam
(different from the undergraduates,
probably during the last week of class [negotiable])
|
20%
|
|
Oral presentation
|
20%
|
|
Critical review of the
literature
|
10%
|
|
Participation in lab
activities, including teaching others
|
10%
|
Note: we have a vote to take! Oral vs. traditional format for the final.
We will talk about this during our first lab meeting. Here are some
former students thoughts:
Oral finals:
anticipation of it is much more stressful than trad final
Very good practice for PhD student esp. for prelims, defense, etc.
Good experience for public speaking -even tho its just to the profs.
Hard to gage 'how you did' after it ends sometimes
I used to hate them, but they are getting easier - I think of them
as a necessary evil.
The thing I like the least is that you know immediately when
you get something wrong and then you have to recover and try
to re-gather
your
thoughts on the fly for the next question.
Especially for a final I think immediate feedback sinks in better
than getting a corrected exam after the term is finished, while
packing for a ski trip or whatever.
Trad Final:
I think I study details more for trad final and concepts more oral
final
It's finite and more predictable
Low stress, possibly more studying
Grades:
A: >93%
A-: 90-92%
B+: 87-89%
B: 83-86%
B-: 80-82%
C+: 77-79%
C: 73-76%
C-: 70-72%
|